|
We are pleased to announce another publication by prof. dr hab. Jerzy Nawrocki published in the latest issue of Earth-Science Reviews:
van der Boon, A., Biggin, A.J., Thallner, D., Hounslow, M.W., Bono, R., Nawrocki, J., Wójcik, K., Paszkowski, M., Königshof, P., de Backer, T., Kabanov, P., Gouwy, S., VandenBerg, R., Da Silva, A.-C., 2022. A persistent non-uniformitarian paleomagnetic field in the Devonian? Earth-Science Rev. 231, 104073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104073
The Devonian has long been a problematic period for paleomagnetism. Devonian paleomagnetic data are generally difficult to interpret and have complex partial or full overprints– problems that arise in data obtained from both sedimentary and igneous rocks. As a result, the reconstruction of tectonic plate motions, largely performed using apparent polar wander paths, has large uncertainty. Similarly, the Devonian geomagnetic polarity time scale is very poorly constrained. Paleointensity studies from volcanic units suggest that the field was much weaker than the modern field, and it has been hypothesised that this was accompanied by many polarity reversals (a hyperreversing field). We sampled Middle to Upper Devonian sections in Germany, Poland and Canada which show low conodont alteration indices, implying low thermal maturity. We show that there are significant issues with these data, which are not straightforward to interpret, even though no significant heating or remineralisation appears to have caused overprinting. We compare our data to other magnetostratigraphic studies from the Devonian and review the polarity pattern as presented in the Geologic Time Scale. Combined with estimates for the strength of the magnetic field, we suggest that the field during the Devonian might have been so weak, and in part non-dipolar, that obtaining reliable primary paleomagnetic data from Devonian rocks is challenging. Careful examination of all data, no matter how unusual, is the best way to push forward our understanding of the Devonian magnetic field. Paleointensity studies show that the field during the Devonian had a similar low strength to the Ediacaran. Independent evidence from malformed spores around the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary suggests that the terrestrial extinction connected to the Hangenberg event was caused by increased UV-B radiation, supporting the weak field hypothesis. A fundamentally weak and possibly non-dipolar field during the Devonian could have been produced, in part, by true polar wander acting to maximise core-mantle heat flow in the equatorial region. It may also have influenced evolution and extinctions in this time period. There are a large number of paleobiological crises in the Devonian, and we pose the question, did the Earth’s magnetic field influence these crises?
Publication list of Institute staff
|
